[Mb-civic] Kerry WON by 1.7M

Wed Dec 8 15:15:30 PST 2004

Voter Fraud in Florida and Ohio:
Kerry Won the Election by at least 1,7 Million Votes
by Brad Menfil
  http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/11/303775.shtml   27 Nov 2004
  www.globalresearch.ca     3 December 2004
The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MEN412A.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Editor's Note:

  A word of caution.

  While the following text presents evidence which is not directly verifiable,
Global Research, nonetheless, took the decision to bring this controversial
text to the attention of our readers. Moreover, the author's identify is not
known.

  The relevance of this text, should be assessed in relation to the large body
of documentation and research already conducted on electoral fraud in America.

  In this regard, we refer the reader to Michael Keefer's extensive 
bibliography
at:

   http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KEE412A.html

  and

  http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KEE411A.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Brad Menfil is not my real name. I work for the RNC. I fear reprisals if I'm
found out.

  The truth about this election is this: Florida and Ohio had to go for Bush in
order for him to "win" the election. In reality he lost both states. 
In fact,
he did not even win the popular vote. He lost the national popular vote by at
least 1,750,000. This shows you the scale of the fraud.

  The exit polls were not wrong. Kerry was the clear winner, but victory was
snatched from him.

  Florida first. The 200,000+ margin of victory for Bush made this state
uncontestable. Everybody assumes that even with some fraud, Kerry could never
have made up the difference in a recount. But Kerry actually won by about
750,000 votes. The numbers were changed by a computer program (in both
electronic and scan-tron voting systems) called "KerryLite." 
"KerryLite" of
course is not actual name of the program. The actual name is 11-5-18-18 etc.
For additional encryption, the numbers were jumbled but I'm not sure in which
order. The numbers replace the letters of the alphabet. For example, K is the
eleventh letter of the alphabet.

  So the if-then statement goes something like this: "if total true 
Kerry>total
true Bush, Bush x 1.04x (.04 is a random number)(total true Kerry), total true
Bush". The second part of the equation takes the total number of votes cast 
and
subtracts the new Bush total, subtracts the third party totals and leaves the
rest for Kerry.

  Sometimes the program would also reduce third party votes and award them to
Bush. And even where Bush legitimately won, he was still awarded additional
votes. The big Democratic counties (Broward for example) went to Kerry because
it had to appear that everything was on the up and up. It's interesting to see
this unfold. Does anybody wonder why the Republican counties were mostly
counted after the Democratic counties? You should wonder, and also know that
this was no accident. The Bush team had to make up the votes as the night went
on.

  In Ohio, computer voting fraud, vote tossing and voter suppression were the
main methods. Vote tossing was simply the removal of Kerry votes and some third
party votes. In some areas, the Bush vs. Kerry votes were absurd. Nine to one,
eight to two.

  Voter suppression took the form of making voters stand in four hour long
lines. This of course took place in Democratic areas. The simplest thing to do
was to have too few voting machines. Sometimes that's all it takes. People
eventually lose patience and leave without casting a vote.

  In other states such as New Mexico, Nevada, Iowa and New Hampshire, Kerry's
leads evaporated very quickly once the polls were shut down. Kerry only won New
Hampshire, but barely. As it turned out, the lead was 6% for Kerry in that 
state
and not enough fraudulent activity took place to flip the state to Bush.

  So this will all come out and be known to everyone. Nothing this massive can
be kept a secret. You're already beginning to see these 
"irregularities" and
the whisper will become a roar.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email this article to a friend

To become a Member of Global Research

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum , at
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants
permission to cross-post original Global Research (Canada) articles in their
entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the
text & title of the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged
as follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca
.  For cross-postings, kindly use the active URL hyperlink address of the
original CRG article. The author's copyright note must be displayed. (For
articles from other news sources, check with the original copyright holder,
where applicable.). For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles in
print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
crgeditor at yahoo.com

For media inquiries: crgeditor at yahoo.com

Lyle K'ang,
~~Enterprise Insights: Advanced Tools for Business Communications!~~
http://www.SiloManagement.com
~~Information, Imagination & Musings~~ 
http://www.Lyve-Oasis.com 