[Mb-civic] EDITORIAL Detainees' Endless Nightmare

[Michael Butler]

latimes.com
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-gitmo2feb02.story
EDITORIAL
Detainees' Endless Nightmare

February 2, 2005

Last June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the hundreds of terror suspects
held for years at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, are entitled to challenge their
open-ended imprisonment. Under our constitutional system, that broad-brush
decision was supposed to settle the matter.

But seven months later, the Justice Department continues to ignore
directives it doesn't want to follow, using circular legal logic to assert
that although detainees can challenge their confinement, judges shouldn't
support those challenges. The Bush administration's hope is to win rulings
that erode the principle the Supreme Court advanced and, in the meantime,
delay releasing or trying the detainees.

The strategy is paying off. In recent weeks, two federal judges in the same
Washington, D.C., courthouse issued virtually opposite decisions on the
rights of Guantanamo detainees. Those rulings ensure a new round of appeals
and, for the detainees, that no end to their confinement is in sight.

In the most recent decision, U.S. District Judge Joyce Hens Green on Monday
rejected the administration's argument that the detainees are beyond the
reach of American law. She also declared unconstitutional the tribunals that
the military convened over the summer in the hope of satisfying the Supreme
Court's ruling. Green insisted that federal judges instead must decide on
the legality of each detention.

But one of Green's colleagues, Judge Richard Leon, reached the opposite
conclusion last month in another case. Leon conceded that Guantanamo
prisoners have a right to file a petition for habeas corpus but disputed
that they have a right to obtain one, because they are not being held on
American soil ‹ reasoning akin to saying sure, you can file the petition,
but we're just going to drop it in the round file.

A federal appeals court will probably decide which view will prevail. The
Supreme Court could decide to revisit the issue as well.

Common sense and human decency should point appeals courts toward
acknowledging that these detainees have the right to legal due process and
to humane treatment. Meanwhile, there seems no end to the creative
humiliations inflicted on them. According to an account late last month in
the New York Times, female interrogators at Guantanamo allegedly tried to
break Muslim male prisoners by sexually touching them and, in one case, by
smearing a man's face with red ink that he was led to believe was menstrual
blood. This followed charges by Red Cross officials that Guantanamo doctors
had withheld medical treatment in an effort to persuade prisoners to
cooperate and that military officials applied psychological and physical
coercion "tantamount to torture." Until federal judges demand fair treatment
for these prisoners in court, forcefully and with one voice, more of the
same will occur in Guantanamo's cells.

If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at
latimes.com/archives.
TMS Reprints
Article licensing and reprint options



Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times