[Mb-civic] Re: The diff. between Canada and US Leaders w/China
Harold Sifton
harry.sifton at sympatico.ca
Fri Feb 4 14:45:54 PST 2005
Barbara
I'm disappointed in MacDonald's piece, which has been unfortunately reproduced by the World Tibet Network. It puts Canada in a bad light.
Thank you for forwarding it Barbara. I totally disagree with his writings.
Martin nor Canadians have ignored China's crimes, but diplomacy is a timing thing and there many more American/Euro/Asian firms there than Canadian, so I do not get his issue!
Even US Senator McCain in Davos said that China will be the world economic power in 15 years.
The real scary thing is that China has no debt, America's is in the high trillions. Canada is low double digit billions and getting lower every year.
I have no Idea of Euro, Japan, Australian, British debt or others.
It was China that gave monies to Putin/Russia to buy Yuko's oil properties. China is also looking at buying Noranda a major Canadian mining company, also Husky Oil and a host of others, which trade on the open market (NYSE , TSE, etc) with CA$H, not shares. Martin is very concerned about that, so he has to be careful, he is trying to protect Canadian natural resources for Canadians. We have experienced foreign companies exploiting our land, i.e. Exxon, Donahue, Monsanto, Shell, Enron, Bunge, Cargill, Petro Fina, ELF etc......(it is a very long list)
Canada has Universal Health Care and our Military although small (we are increasing our budget, for Canadians "have told" their government that they want a more capable force) is also out there Peace Keeping esp. Afghanistan. Point being we are trying to do good. We are highly taxed, up to 54% on the high end, a 15% sales tax on purchase almost all goods, and we still have a good quality of life, but we are only 35 million people trying to manage a very large county (infostructure)
Martin has proven to be a good human rights campaigner (Africa and reducing 3rd world debt, even Bono likes/hangs with him), so why Macdonald of the Toronto Sun (right wing) is dumping on him I do not know.
As far as getting votes, Martin has no plans for re-election in 4 years, he is in his late 60's, but he is running a minority government and that has it's problems as to decision making. He is trying to pass the same sex laws, but he is having problems with the Canadian Right and American Right lobbyists who are pressuring the Conservative Party, the official opposition.
Yes Canada must deal with China economically, we would be fools not too.
Canada is not a perfect society, we have our issues, but we are trying to do our best and we are not doing to badly at it. On a per capita basis we are the best of the G7 in the matter of Human Rights, economic policy and debt management! So please tell me how much more can we do?
Later H
PS sorry about the diatribe, but that article really pissed me off.
----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Siomos
To: mb-civic at islandlists.com ; harry.sifton at sympatico.ca
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: The diff. between Canada and US Leaders w/China
World Tibet Network News
Published by: The Canada Tibet Committee
Editorial Board: Brian Given, Conrad Richter, Nima
Dorjee, Tseten Samdup, Thubten (Sam) Samdup
WTN Editors: wtn-editors at tibet.ca
__________________________________________2. PM ignores china crimes
while bush fights for freedom (TS)
----------------------------------------------
The Toronto Sun
By Bob MacDonald
21 January 2005
Martin is glossing over human rights
WHILE GEORGE W. Bush was dedicating his new term yesterday to "ending
tyranny in our world," Paul Martin was defending the Communist police
state of China's sorry record of human rights infractions.
And that's the blunt difference between the American president as he
enters his second four-year term and Canada's Liberal prime minister as
he shakily clings to power.
"America's influence is not unlimited, but fortunately for the
oppressed, America's influence is considerable and we will use it
confidently in freedom's cause," declared Bush in his inaugural address
heard around the globe.
He contended America's own freedom is tied now to the success of freedom
being established around the world, but the U.S. will not impose its own
style of democratic government. "Our goal, instead, is to help others
find their own voices, attain their own freedom, and make their own
way," said Bush.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, Martin was telling a press
conference in Beijing that the Chinese regime -- sometimes called the
Beijing Butchers -- was making "considerable progress" in cleaning up
its human rights atrocities. "I believe
the (Chinese) government does understand that you cannot have reforms in
one section without having reforms in the area of human rights. It's an
essential area of human progress," he said.
Right. But Martin didn't have the guts to state those words in public to
the Beijing bosses or in any of his speeches during his visit. Any real
mention of human rights was made in private to China's Premier Wen
Jiabao. And that included a protest against China barring two
Chinese-Canadian journalists from entering the country with him.
Heck, Martin didn't even make any comment to the premier about the death
this week of Zhao Ziyang, the Chinese premier who was purged after he
showed sympathy for students who demanded more
freedom 15 years ago in Tiananmen Square. That's
when the government was named the Beijing Butchers after they had the
army massacre thousands of the young students. Since then, Zhao
was held in house arrest.
A MARK OF RESPECT
Even Jason Kenny, a Conservative MP who is part of the Canadian
delegation, said he planned to visit Zhao's home as a mark of respect.
He suggested Martin should do the same: "I think it would be an
elegant way for the prime minister to express Canada's solidarity with
human rights in the world's largest country by paying his respects to a
former premier." But Martin was careful to make any
mention of his human rights concerns to a press conference not carried
on any Chinese TV, radio or newspaper.
Of course, all media are tightly controlled by the regime. It's called
censorship. And, as far as we know, our courageous PM also failed to
protest China's continued occupation and imposition of a form of
genocide on Tibet. During the 53-year occupation, the Chinese invaders
have killed
more than 1.2 million Tibetans by shootings, torture, rapes,
imprisonment, forced labour and starvation.
After a revolt in 1959, Tibet's spiritual and political leader, the
Dalai Lama, escaped over the Himalayas to India. The Chinese have killed
thousands of Buddhist monks and destroyed all but 40 of Tibet's 6,254
monasteries. Thousands of the
six million people had to flee into exile. So why is
Martin so gutlessly quiet about China's crimes?
Well, like his Grit predecessor, Jean Chretien, he thinks by
"co-operating" with the Beijing comrades, Canada can improve its trade
with the Communist giant. After all, who can really compete with a
country of 1.3 billion people who use child and
prison labour along with sweatshop wages for the
masses? There are no strikes or meaningful unions
in China. The result: China sold $18.3 billion of its
cheap-labour goods to Canada in 2003 while Canada sold only $4.7 billion
of our higher-labour-cost goods to China. And the gap is
widening.
Also, China is now the leading source of immigrants to Canada -- and
that means voters that Martin and the Liberals constantly woo. They want
to keep this "immigrant vote" happy.
So, while President Bush is out to spread freedom and democracy in the
world, Martin is out to boost trade and pick up some votes.
And to hell with this human rights stuff.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You cannot do a kindness too soon for you never know when it will be too late"Ralph Waldo Emerson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20050204/97322fd0/attachment.html
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list