[Mb-civic] EDITORIAL Rumsfield

Michael Butler michael at michaelbutler.com
Mon Feb 7 11:01:05 PST 2005


latimes.com
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-nuclear7feb07.story
EDITORIAL
Rumsfeld's Nuclear Genie

February 7, 2005

In his State of the Union speech, President Bush declared that he will
contain the budget deficit and pursue peaceful diplomacy to end the nuclear
programs of Iran and North Korea. But Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's
insistence on reviving a wasteful and dangerous nuclear program undermines
both goals.

Last year, at the urging of Rep. David L. Hobson (R-Ohio), chairman of the
House Appropriations subcommittee on energy and water, Congress slashed all
funding for Rumsfeld's pet project ‹ studying how to build a nuclear weapon
capable of penetrating hardened underground targets. Ever since,
administration hawks have been howling that the United States would be
imperiled without the "bunker buster" weapons.

As the Pentagon has acknowledged, Rumsfeld sent a memo last month to
outgoing Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham urging him to restore funds for
the program in next year's budget.

The administration is stressing that the study is a research program and
that Congress would have to give the go-ahead for actually building bunker
busters. But its efforts make a mockery of U.S. attempts to curb the
proliferation of nuclear weapons around the globe. How can the
administration plausibly claim that it wants to halt the spread of these
weapons even as it seeks to invent new ones and drastically lower the
threshold for using them?

What's more, there's no reason that precision-guided conventional weapons
can't perform the same task of shattering bunkers. The problem with a
nuclear warhead is that, according to scientific experts, the casing would
almost certainly shatter as it penetrated the ground. The result: Tons of
radioactive material would be released into the air.

And then there's the price tag. According to the Energy Department, the cost
to taxpayers to research and build this dud would be almost $500 million
over five years.

The military can always come up with reasons for new weapons, but lawmakers
were right to stuff the nuclear genie back in the bottle last year. They
should not allow Rumsfeld to reopen it.

If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at
latimes.com/archives.
TMS Reprints
Article licensing and reprint options



Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times



More information about the Mb-civic mailing list