[Mb-civic] EDITORIAL Why Felons Deserve the Right to Vote

[Michael Butler]

 The New York Times
February 7, 2005
EDITORIAL
Why Felons Deserve the Right to Vote

In a watershed moment for the debate over whether convicted felons should be
allowed to vote, the American Correctional Association has issued a welcome
statement calling on states to end the practice of withholding voting rights
from parolees and people who have completed their prison terms. Noting that
society expects people to become responsible members of society once they
are released from prison, the organization, which represents corrections
officials, also called on states to cut through the confusing thicket of
disenfranchisement laws by explaining clearly to inmates how they get their
rights back after completing their sentences.

Some five million Americans are barred from the polls by a bewildering
patchwork of state laws that strip convicted felons of the right to vote,
often temporarily, but sometimes for life. These laws serve no correctional
purpose - and may actually contribute to recidivism by keeping ex-offenders
and their families disengaged from the civic mainstream. This notion is
clearly supported by data showing that former offenders who vote are less
likely to return to jail. This lesson has long since been absorbed by
democracies abroad, some valuing the franchise so much that they take ballot
boxes right to the prisons.

Several states are now reconsidering laws barring convicted felons from
voting. In Maryland, for instance, the legislature is considering a bill
that would eliminate a lifetime ban that remains in place for some
offenders. The Maryland bill should pass. And other states should follow
suit.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search |
Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top


In a watershed moment for the debate over whether convicted felons should be
allowed to vote, the American Correctional Association has issued a welcome
statement calling on states to end the practice of withholding voting rights
from parolees and people who have completed their prison terms. Noting that
society expects people to become responsible members of society once they
are released from prison, the organization, which represents corrections
officials, also called on states to cut through the confusing thicket of
disenfranchisement laws by explaining clearly to inmates how they get their
rights back after completing their sentences.

Some five million Americans are barred from the polls by a bewildering
patchwork of state laws that strip convicted felons of the right to vote,
often temporarily, but sometimes for life. These laws serve no correctional
purpose - and may actually contribute to recidivism by keeping ex-offenders
and their families disengaged from the civic mainstream. This notion is
clearly supported by data showing that former offenders who vote are less
likely to return to jail. This lesson has long since been absorbed by
democracies abroad, some valuing the franchise so much that they take ballot
boxes right to the prisons.

Several states are now reconsidering laws barring convicted felons from
voting. In Maryland, for instance, the legislature is considering a bill
that would eliminate a lifetime ban that remains in place for some
offenders. The Maryland bill should pass. And other states should follow
suit.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search |
Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top