[Mb-civic] Among the believers (who needs logic when you've got
power?)
ean at sbcglobal.net
ean at sbcglobal.net
Mon Feb 21 20:29:44 PST 2005
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/19/cpac/
Among the believers
At the Conservative Political Action Conference, where rabid Bush-
worshippers learn that liberals hate America and that we really did
find WMD in Iraq.
By Michelle Goldberg for SALON.COM
Feb. 19, 2005| WASHINGTON -- It's a good thing I went to the
Conservative Political Action Conference this year. Otherwise I never
would have known that, despite the findings of the authoritative David Kay
report and every reputable media outlet on earth, the United States actually
discovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, vindicating all of George
W. Bush's pre-war predictions. The revelation came not from some crank
at Free Republic or hustler from Talon News, but from a congressman
surrounded by men from the highest echelons of American government.
No wonder the attendees all seemed to believe him.
The crowd at CPAC's Thursday night banquet, held at D.C.'s Ronald
Reagan Building, was full of right-wing stars. Among those seated at the
long presidential table at the head of the room were Henry Hyde, chairman
of the House International Relations Committee, Kansas Sen. Sam
Brownback, Minnesota Sen. Norm Coleman, Dore Gold, foreign policy
advisor to former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and NRA
president Kayne Robinson. Vice President Dick Cheney, a regular CPAC
speaker, gave the keynote address. California Rep. Chris Cox had the
honor of introducing him, and he took the opportunity to mock the
Democrats whose hatred of America led them to get Iraq so horribly
wrong.
"America's Operation Iraqi Freedom is still producing shock and awe, this
time among the blame-America-first crowd," he crowed. Then he said,
"We continue to discover biological and chemical weapons and facilities to
make them inside Iraq." Apparently, most of the hundreds of people in
attendance already knew about these remarkable, hitherto-unreported
discoveries, because no one gasped at this startling revelation.
And why would they? Like comrades celebrating the success of Mao's
Great Leap Forward, attendees at CPAC, the oldest and largest right-wing
conference in the country, invest their leaders with the power to defy mere
reality through force of insistent rhetoric. The triumphant recent election is
all the proof they need that everything George W. Bush says is true. Sure,
there's skepticism of the president's wonder-working power among some of
the old movement hands -- including the leaders of the American
Conservative Union, which puts CPAC on. For much of the rank and file,
though, the thousands of blue-blazered students and local activists who
come to CPAC each year to celebrate the völkisch virtues of nationalism,
capitalism and heterosexuality, Bush is truth. They don rhinestone W
brooches and buy mouse pads, posters and T-shirts showing the president
as a kind of beefcake Uncle Sam, with flowing white hair and bulging
muscles threatening to rend his red, white and blue garments.
It's not only liberals who have noticed that Bush's most committed
followers are caught up in the fact-filtering force field of a personality cult.
In January, Paul Craig Roberts, assistant secretary of the treasury during
the Reagan administration and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal's
far-right editorial page, published a damning column in the progressive Z
Magazine about fascist tendencies in the conservative movement. "In the
ranks of the new conservatives, however, I see and experience much hate.
It comes to me in violently worded, ignorant and irrational emails from
self-professed conservatives who literally worship George Bush," he wrote.
"Even Christians have fallen into idolatry. There appears to be a large
number of Americans who are prepared to kill anyone for George Bush
Like Brownshirts, the new conservatives take personally any criticism of
their leader and his policies. To be a critic is to be an enemy."
This kind of ground-level devotion was key to the volunteer-driven get-
out-the-vote campaign, and the administration sent important emissaries to
convey the president's gratitude. Although the Republicans always have
high-powered representatives at CPAC, this year the lineup at the three-day
conference is particularly impressive. On the first day alone, attendees
heard from Karl Rove and Sen. Rick Santorum as well as Cheney. Tonight,
there will be a speech by Zell Miller, the former Democratic senator who
delivered the vein-popping keynote address at this year's Republican
National Convention. He'll be delivering a "Courage Under Fire" award to
the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. Tomorrow, we'll hear from Republican
National Committee chair Ken Mehlman and Newt Gingrich.
Neither Cheney nor Rove said anything very interesting. As he does most
years, the vice president essentially rehashed Bush's State of the Union,
although he mercifully omitted any reference to the Federal Marriage
Amendment. Rove's speech was about the growth of the right from "a
small principled opposition" to "a broad and inclusive movement that is
self-assured, confident and optimistic, and forward leading, and most
important of all, dominant in American politics today."
Their mere presence was more significant than their words, putting the
White House imprimatur on an event that featured, in addition to the Swift
Boat Veterans, venomous CPAC regulars like Ann Coulter, Oliver North
and Michelle "In Defense of Internment" Malkin. It was yet more evidence
that this administration puts little distance between itself and the most
reactionary forces in the Republican Party.
The people who come to CPAC range from very conservative to proto-
fascist. Within that grouping, though, are a host of different concerns.
Some of CPACers hate taxes and love guns but are basically social
libertarians. Others, like the American Society for the Defense of
Tradition, Family and Property, a far-right Catholic outfit, support the
criminalization of homosexuality and oppose legalized birth control. A few
have very specific grievances, like the man who stood after Santorum's talk
to rant about judges who discriminate against fathers during custody
disputes and women who won't let their ex-husbands see their children
more than twice a month.
In his speech, Santorum tried to unite the various constituencies behind the
anti-gay marriage amendment with the Orwellian argument that such an
amendment is actually necessary to keep government out of people's
private lives.
"I know there are some people who may be economic conservatives and
not consider themselves cultural conservatives," he said. Addressing
himself to them, he tried to explain how banning gay marriage is crucial to
laissez-faire governing. "Think about those communities where marriage
does not exist," he said, invoking their poverty and illegitimacy. "What you
see is a model of what life would look like in a country that has fathers and
mothers not wedded together in strong relationships to raise children." In
poor neighborhoods, he said, there's a strong government presence,
"because if Mom and Dad isn't there to raise the child, someone else has to
bridge the gap, and that someone else is always the government."
Santorum didn't quite explain how proscribing gay unions would
strengthen families in poor communities. The assumption seemed to be that
homosexuality would make a travesty of matrimony. Like a suburban block
where undesirables insist on moving in, its worth would go down. "If we
deconstruct marriage in society, if we say marriage is whatever you want it
to be, then marriage loses its intrinsic value," he said.
"I'm talking at a very protective level about what is important to our
society if we are to be a free people," he said. "The less virtue we have in
our society, the more the need for government to control our lives, to
govern our lives." In other words, government needs to enforce virtue in
order to keep government out of our lives.
This argument seemed to make sense to his audience.
Who needs logic when you've got power?
About the writer
Michelle Goldberg is a senior writer for Salon based in New York.
--
You are currently on Mha Atma's Earth Action Network email list,
option D (up to 3 emails/day). To be removed, or to switch options
(option A - 1x/week, option B - 3/wk, option C - up to 1x/day, option
D - up to 3x/day) please reply and let us know! If someone
forwarded you this email and you want to be on our list, send an
email to ean at sbcglobal.net and tell us which option you'd like.
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
--- George Orwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20050221/a3e98190/attachment.html
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list