[Mb-civic] DeLay Accuses Earle of Misconduct - Washington Post
William Swiggard
swiggard at comcast.net
Sat Oct 8 07:28:02 PDT 2005
DeLay Accuses Earle of Misconduct
Lawmaker's Attorneys Seek Dismissal of Oct. 3 Indictment
By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, October 8, 2005; Page A09
Lawyers for former House majority leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) asked a
Texas court yesterday to quash his indictment on Oct. 3 for money
laundering in the 2002 election on the grounds that the charge resulted
from misconduct by the Texas prosecutor overseeing the case.
The Texas prosecutor promptly disputed the claim.
The motion, introduced in Austin, followed the themes struck by DeLay in
public appearances since the grand jury's action, but it also added new
details to his allegations of wrongdoing by Travis County District
Attorney Ronnie Earle in the past two weeks. That was the period in
which Earle presented the facts of his case to three separate grand
juries and obtained two indictments that named three specific charges.
One was an allegation of conspiracy by DeLay and two political aides to
violate Texas election laws by injecting illegal corporate contributions
into state election campaigns. The other two were allegations that DeLay
and his aides laundered the illegal corporate contributions through the
Republican National Committee in Washington, and that they conspired
together in organizing the scheme.
The DeLay legal team's motion yesterday alleged that Earle and his
staff, after realizing that the initial indictment of DeLay on Sept. 28
for conspiracy lacked a credible legal basis, "engaged in an
extraordinarily irregular, and desperate attempt to contrive a viable
charge and get a substitute indictment" -- namely, the allegation of
money laundering.
The motion said that in so doing, Earle and his staff first improperly
"attempted to browbeat and coerce" a second grand jury into bringing the
new charge. It said that after failing to do so, they tried "to cover up
and delay public disclosure" of the decision by the second grand jury.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/07/AR2005100701897.html?nav=hcmodule
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20051008/8f96f82a/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list