[Mb-civic] Immigration Nation?

[ean at sbcglobal.net]

Today's commentary:
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2006-01/25feffer.cfm

==================================

ZNet Commentary
Immigration Nation? February 08, 2006
By John Feffer 

The fifteen Cubans thought they had made it to the United States.  In
early January, they sailed in a homemade boat from Cuba and reached an old
bridge on the southern tip of Florida.  According to the U.S. immigration
policy known as "wet foot, dry foot," Cubans who reach U.S. soil can stay.
 Those picked up at sea are returned to Cuba.  

Unfortunately for these fifteen Cubans, the bridge they reached was
derelict and partially collapsed.  It was no longer connected to the
Florida mainland.  So, according to the U.S. government, the refugees had
not technically touched U.S. soil.  The Coast Guard picked them up and
sent them back.  It didn't matter that Florida is Jeb Bush territory, and
the Republicans depend on the votes of Cuban-Americans.

This bizarre incident is only the latest example of the hypocrisies of
U.S. immigration policy.  Although the Statue of Liberty famously welcomes
the tired, the poor, and the "huddled masses yearning to breathe free,"
the United States is very careful about who it lets into the country.  

Take the case of North Koreans.  The U.S. government has criticized China
for returning North Korean refugees against their will to North Korea. 
U.S. conservatives routinely lambaste the South Korean government for not
doing more on the human rights issue.  But rhetoric notwithstanding, the
U.S. government has not officially accepted any North Korean asylum
seekers - even though several have applied at U.S. consulates throughout
the world.  South Korea, meanwhile, accepts hundreds every year.

Cubans and North Koreans come from countries deemed "evil" by the Bush
administration, and still they are not welcomed to the United States. 
Those fleeing authoritarian regimes supported by the administration
certainly don't receive a warmer welcome.  The paranoia created by 9/11
hasn't helped matters either.

The most glaring hypocrisies, however, can be found along America's
southern border with Mexico.  Although Washington consistently rails
against illegal immigrants, the U.S. economy has become increasingly
dependent on the work of an estimated 8 million undocumented laborers. 
Without these undocumented workers, U.S. crops would go unpicked.  And 
few
American citizens are willing to accept very low wages for dirty,
difficult, and dangerous jobs in the manufacturing and service sectors.  

Unofficially, the U.S. government recognizes the important contributions
of these workers.  After all, it has pushed free-trade policies with
Mexico and other countries that have made their small-scale agriculture
unprofitable, pushed farmers off the land, and sent them north by the
hundreds of thousands in search of work.  Since 1994, when the North
American Free Trade Agreement went into effect, the number of Mexicans
coming every year to the United States (with and without documents) has
nearly tripled.

Despite this unofficial encouragement of immigration flow, the U.S.
authorities have officially deployed much harsher measures at the border
to discourage would-be entrants.  Higher walls and more frequent patrols
have meant that border-crossers are taking greater risks of dying from
heat stroke and dehydration.  Since the imposition of the Southwest Border
Strategy in 1993, according to the organization Coalición de Derechos
Humanos, over 3,000 migrants have died trying to get across the border. 

Establishing a system by which foreign workers have a legal means of
coming to the United States - along with enforceable regulations to
prevent their exploitation - would go a long way toward rationalizing U.S.
immigration policy.  But illegal workers don't vote.  So few politicians
support their cause.

The latest bill on immigration - which passed the House in mid-December by
a vote of 239 to 182 - is a case in point.  In addition to new security
measures at the border, the bill would criminalize not only undocumented
workers but their families and their employers as well.  A guest worker
program supported by Democrats and moderate Republicans was dropped 
from
the legislation.  

The United States is not alone in having a shortsighted immigration
policy.  Japan, despite a declining population and a labor shortage,
maintains a famously insular attitude.  Although the European Union
absorbed ten more countries in 2004, most European countries have made it
very difficult for those outside Europe to gain entrance.  

But these countries never claimed to be built by and for immigrants.  At a
time when its economy is dangerously indebted and its military dangerously
over-rated, the United States has one quality indispensable for success in
the global age: a multicultural population.  Between 2000 and 2004,
according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 60 percent of the increase in
the U.S. workforce came from immigrants.  But it's not just a workforce
issue.  U.S. multiculturalism challenges persistent racism and jingoism in
American society.  And a culturally diverse population, with links to
countries all around the world, can help create a foreign policy that is
neither imperial nor hegemonic.

Certainly the United States should support policies that raise wages
worldwide and narrow the income gaps that compel workers to cross borders.
 In the meantime, though, America owes it to the world - and to itself -
to come up with an immigration policy free of appalling hypocrisy.

John Feffer, www.johnfeffer.com, is the author of North Korea, South
Korea: U.S. Policy at a Time of Crisis.



-- 
You are currently on Mha Atma's Earth Action Network email list, 
option D (up to 3 emails/day).  To be removed, or to switch options 
(option A - 1x/week, option B - 3/wk, option C - up to 1x/day, option D - 
up to 3x/day) please reply and let us know!  If someone forwarded you 
this email and you want to be on our list, send an email to 
ean at sbcglobal.net and tell us which option you'd like.


"A war of aggression is the supreme international crime." -- Robert Jackson,
 former U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice and Nuremberg prosecutor

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060212/e19f922d/attachment.htm