[Mb-hair] THIS IS THE REAL STORY IN OHIO --Bush won by spoilage
ballots
SharmagneS at aol.com
SharmagneS at aol.com
Sun Nov 7 11:48:26 PST 2004
THE WISDOM FUND News & Views
MORE AT http://www.twf.org/
November 04, 2004
TomPaine.com
KERRY WON . . .
by Greg Palast
Bush won Ohio by 136,483 votes. Typically in the United States, about 3
percent of votes cast are voidedknown as "spoilage" in election
jargonbecause the ballots cast are inconclusive. Drawing on what happened in
Florida and studies of elections past, Palast argues that if Ohio's discarded
ballots were counted, Kerry would have won the state.
Today, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports there are a total of 247,672 votes
not counted in Ohio, if you add the 92,672 discarded votes plus the 155,000
provisional ballots.
So far there's no indication that Palast's hypothesis will be tested because
only the provisional ballots are being counted.
Greg Palast, contributing editor to Harper's magazine, investigated the
manipulation of the vote for BBC Television's Newsnight. The documentary,
"Bush Family Fortunes," based on his New York Times bestseller, The Best
Democracy Money Can Buy, has been released this month on DVD .
Kerry won. Here's the facts.
I know you don't want to hear it. You can't face one more hung chad. But I
don't have a choice. As a journalist examining that messy sausage called
American democracy, it's my job to tell you who got the most votes in the deciding
states. Tuesday, in Ohio and New Mexico, it was John Kerry.
Most voters in Ohio thought they were voting for Kerry. CNN's exit poll
showed Kerry beating Bush among Ohio women by 53 percent to 47 percent. Kerry
also defeated Bush among Ohio's male voters 51 percent to 49 percent.Unless a
third gender voted in Ohio, Kerry took the state.
So what's going on here? Answer: the exit polls are accurate. Pollsters
ask, "Who did you vote for?" Unfortunately, they don't ask the crucial,
question, "Was your vote counted?" The voters don't know.
Here's why. Although the exit polls show that most voters in Ohio punched
cards for Kerry-Edwards, thousands of these votes were simply not recorded.This
was predictable and it was predicted.
[See TomPaine.com, "An Election Spoiled Rotten," November 1.]
Once again, at the heart of the Ohio uncounted vote game are, I'm sorry to
report, hanging chads and pregnant chads, plus some other ballot tricks old and
new.
The election in Ohio was not decided by the voters but by something
called"spoilage." Typically in the United States, about 3 percent of the vote is
voided, just thrown away, not recorded. When the bobble-head boobs on the tube tell
you Ohio or any state was won by 51 percent to 49 percent, don'tyou believe
it ... it has never happened in the United States, because the total never
reaches a neat 100 percent. The television totals simply subtract out the spoiled
vote.
Whose Votes Are Discarded?
And not all votes spoil equally. Most of those votes, say every official
report, come from African-American and minority precincts. (To learn
more, click here.)
We saw this in Florida in 2000. Exit polls showed Gore with a plurality of
at least 50,000, but it didn't match the official count. That's because the
official, Secretary of State Katherine Harris, excluded 179,855 spoiled
votes. In Florida, as in Ohio, most of these votes lost were cast on punch
cards where the hole wasn't punched through completelyleaving a 'hanging
chad,'or was punched extra times.
Whose cards were discarded? Expert statisticians investigating spoilage for
the government calculated that 54 percent of the ballots thrown in the dumpster
were cast by black folks.
(To read the report from the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, click here .)
And here's the key: Florida is terribly typical. The majority of ballots
thrown out (there will be nearly 2 million tossed out from Tuesday's
election) will have been cast by African American and other minority
citizens.
So here we go again. Or, here we don't go again. Because unlike last time,
Democrats aren't even asking Ohio to count these cards with the
not-quite-punched holes (called "undervotes" in the voting biz). Nor are
they demanding we look at the "overvotes" where voter intent may be
discerned.
Ohio is one of the last states in America to still use the vote-spoiling
punch-card machines. And the Secretary of State of Ohio, J. Kenneth
Blackwell, wrote before the election, "the possibility of a close election
with punch cards as the state's primary voting device invites a
Florida-like calamity."
But this week, Blackwell, a rabidly partisan Republican, has warmed up to the
result of sticking with machines that have a habit of eating Democratic
votes. When asked if he feared being this year's Katherine Harris, Blackwell noted
that Ms. Fix-it's efforts landed her a seat in Congress.
Exactly how many votes were lost to spoilage this time? Blackwell's office,
notably, won't say, though the law requires it be reported. Hmm. But we know
that last time, the total of Ohio votes discarded reached a
democracy-damaging 1.96 percent. The machines produced their typical
lossthat's 110,000 votesoverwhelmingly Democratic.
The Impact Of Challenges
First and foremost, Kerry was had by chads. But the Democrat wasn't punched
out by punch cards alone. There were also the 'challenges.' That's a polite
word for the Republican Party of Ohio's use of an old Ku Klux Klan technique: the
attempt to block thousands of voters of color at the polls.
In Ohio, Wisconsin and Florida, the GOP laid plans for poll workers to
ambush citizens under arcane lawsalmost never usedallowing
party-designated poll watchers to finger individual voters and demand they be
denied a ballot. The Ohio courts were horrified and federal law
prohibits targeting of voters where race is a factor in the challenge. But
our Supreme Court was prepared to let Republicans stand in the voting booth
door.
In the end, the challenges were not overwhelming, but they were there. Many
apparently resulted in voters getting these funky "provisional" ballotsa kind
of voting placebowhich may or may not be counted.
Blackwell estimates there were 175,000; Democrats say 250,000. Pick your
number. But as challenges were aimed at minorities, no one doubts these are,
again, overwhelmingly Democratic. Count them up, add in the spoiled punch cards
(easy to tally with the human eye in a recount), and the totals begin to match
the exit polls; and, golly, you've got yourself a new president.
Remember, Bush won by 136,483 votes in Ohio.
Enchanted State's Enchanted Vote
Now, on to New Mexico, where a Kerry pluralityif all votes are countedis
more obvious still. Before the election, in TomPaine.com, I wrote, "John
Kerry is down by several thousand votes in New Mexico, though not one
ballot has yet been counted."
How did that happen? It's the spoilage, stupid; and the provisional ballots.
CNN said George Bush took New Mexico by 11,620 votes. Again, the network
total added up to that miraculous, and non-existent, '100 percent' of
ballots cast.
New Mexico reported in the last race a spoilage rate of 2.68 percent, votes
lost almost entirely in Hispanic, Native American and poor
precinctsDemocratic turf. From Tuesday's vote, assuming the same
ballot-loss rate, we can expect to see 18,000 ballots in the spoilage bin.
Spoilage has a very Democratic look in New Mexico. Hispanic voters in the
Enchanted State, who voted more than two to one for Kerry, are five times
as likely to have their vote spoil as a white voter. Counting these
uncounted votes would easily overtake the Bush 'plurality.'
Already, the election-bending effects of spoilage are popping up in the
election stats, exactly where we'd expect them: in heavily Hispanic areas
controlled by Republican elections officials. Chaves County, in the "Little
Texas" area of New Mexico, has a 44 percent Hispanic population, plus
African Americans and Native Americans, yet George Bush "won" there 68
percent to 31 percent.
I spoke with Chaves' Republican county clerk before the election, and he
told me that this huge spoilage rate among Hispanics simply indicated that
such people simply can't make up their minds on the choice of candidate for
president. Oddly, these brown people drive across the desert to register
their indecision in a voting booth.
Now, let's add in the effect on the New Mexico tally of provisional ballots.
"They were handing them out like candy," Albuquerque journalist Renee Blake
reported of provisional ballots. About 20,000 were given out. Who got them?
Santiago Juarez who ran the "Faithful Citizenship" program for the Catholic
Archdiocese in New Mexico, told me that "his" voters, poor Hispanics, whom
he identified as solid Kerry supporters, were handed the iffy provisional
ballots. Hispanics were given provisional ballots, rather than the
countable kind "almost religiously," he said, at polling stations when
there was the least question about a voter's identification. Some voters,
Santiago said, were simply turned away.
Your Kerry Victory Party
So we can call Ohio and New Mexico for John Kerryif we count all the votes.
But that won't happen. Despite the Democratic Party's pledge, the
leadership this time gave in to racial disenfranchisement once again. Why?
No doubt, the Democrats know darn well that counting all the spoiled and
provisional ballots will require the cooperation of Ohio's Secretary of
State, Blackwell. He will ultimately decide which spoiled and provisional
ballots get tallied. Blackwell, hankering to step into Kate Harris'
political pumps, is unlikely to permit anything close to a full count.
Also, Democratic leadership knows darn well the media would punish the
party for demanding a full count.
What now? Kerry won, so hold your victory party. But make sure the shades
are down: it may be become illegal to demand a full vote count under
PATRIOT Act III.
I used to write a column for the Guardian papers in London. Several friends
have asked me if I will again leave the country. In light of the failurea
second timeto count all the votes, that won't be necessary. My country has
left me.
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/kerry_won_.php
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-hair/attachments/20041107/11bd3b63/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-hair
mailing list