[Mb-hair] Trapped Like a Rat By William Rivers Pitt

[Michael Butler]

    Trapped Like a Rat
    By William Rivers Pitt
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

    Thursday 09 February 2006

    The funeral for civil rights leader Coretta Scott King on Tuesday was
quite a sight to see. The depth of sadness in the room could not be overcome
by the happiness that came with the celebration of her life and
accomplishments. It was the measure of Mrs. King's impact upon our society
that four presidents - Carter, Bush, Clinton and Bush - sat before her
flower-draped casket and spoke of her life.

    And then, of course, the foolishness began. The nattering nabobs of
network nonsense blithered into their cable news studios to deplore all the
political statements that were served up before the appreciative crowd in
that church. It was the Wellstone funeral all over again.

    Let's be clear. The life of Coretta Scott King was one that involved
politics from every angle. Any lifelong struggle against poverty, racism and
war is going to be a life immersed in politics. That is simply the way it
is; because so many politicians and political ideologies center around
statements and legislation that directly add to the burdens of the poor and
minorities, any person choosing to fight poverty and racism is going to wind
up dealing in politics.

    Gandhi was elected to no office in his entire lifetime, but every action
he took involved politics. The same can be said for Martin Luther King Jr.,
who won no elections but changed politics in America forever. Coretta Scott
King held no office, but her work affected the politics of this country in
every way. Ask Gold Star mother Cindy Sheehan, who received a warm telephone
call from Mrs. King while standing vigil outside George W. Bush's ranch in
Crawford last August. If this was not a political act, then political acts
do not exist.

    Politics belonged in that church on Tuesday. Period.

    A good deal of the humbug arising from the political statements at the
funeral are based upon the fact that George W. Bush changed his schedule to
appear at the event. Because he did this, the thinking goes, he should be
above the pointed criticism he absorbed up on that stage. Smart money says
he came to the funeral only to avoid the criticism he would have received
had he not shown up with those three other presidents. Smart money likewise
says he came to try and shore up his poll numbers with African Americans;
his support among this constituency stands in the low single digits, well
within the margin of error in any poll, suggesting his actual support among
this group is zero. This is, however, an issue for another day.

    The central tenet of the civil rights movement has, is and will always
be one simple truth: one must speak truth to power in order to affect
change. This was the maxim by which Coretta Scott King lived her life, and
the maxim by which her husband lived and ultimately died by. Had her funeral
not involved speaking truth to power, the ceremony would have been
incomplete. George W. Bush heard on Tuesday some hard truths that his
fanatical insulation has to date spared him from. It may have been the
healthiest moment this republic has absorbed in years.

    President Jimmy Carter, who has come to be one of the harshest critics
of Mr. Bush, hurled fire across the stage over the deplorable administration
response to Hurricane Katrina. "This commemorative ceremony this morning and
this afternoon is not only to acknowledge the great contributions of Coretta
and Martin, but to remind us that the struggle for equal rights is not
over," said Carter. "We only have to recall the color of the faces of those
in Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi, those who were most devastated by
Katrina, to know that there are not yet equal opportunities for all
Americans."

    Carter also took a moment to drop a brick over the recent revelations
that the NSA has been spying on Americans, without court approval or
warrants, at the behest of Mr. Bush. "It was difficult for them personally,"
said Carter, "with the civil liberties of both husband and wife violated as
they became the target of secret government wiretapping, other surveillance,
and as you know, harassment from the FBI."

    By far, the harshest criticism came from Rev. Joseph Lowery, a King
protégé, who spoke of Mrs. King's staunch opposition to the occupation of
Iraq. "She deplored the terror inflicted by our smart bombs on missions way
afar," said Lowery. "We know now there were no weapons of mass destruction
over there. But Coretta knew, and we knew, that there are weapons of
misdirection right down here. Millions without health insurance. Poverty
abounds. For war, billions more, but no more for the poor."

    Would Coretta Scott King have approved of this? One can be certain that
the woman who said "If American women would increase their voting turnout by
ten percent, I think we would see an end to all of the budget cuts in
programs benefiting women and children" would have certainly approved.

    This was a day for speaking truth to power, but it was more than that.
Mr. Bush and his people have worked incredibly hard to keep this president
from hearing anything that rubs against what he believes to be true. He
speaks before hand-picked crowds of adoring supporters, never once seeing
the face of someone who thinks he is running the nation into the ground.
Millions upon millions of protesters have followed his every move, and yet
it is almost certain he has never laid eyes upon a single one of them.

    On Tuesday, by his own design. George W. Bush was trapped like a rat on
that stage. He was forced to listen to eloquent denunciations of his
politics and his policies, perhaps for the first time since he took office.
The effect upon him was clear; during the speeches delivered by Rev. Lowery
and president Carter, Bush looked as if he was sucking on a particularly
bitter lemon.

    When one speaks truth to power, especially arrogant power, that is
usually the effect. Coretta Scott King would have approved.